[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":47},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-sw-115-2-research-methods-003":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectFullName":4,"question":6,"related":24},"社會工作研究方法","research-methods",{"id":7,"webId":8,"year":9,"session":10,"subject":4,"legacy":11,"number":12,"stem":13,"options":14,"answer":19,"answerNote":20,"images":21,"lawTimestamp":9,"explanation":22,"freq":23},"sw-115-2-社會工作研究方法-003","sw-115-2-research-methods-003",115,2,false,3,"研究者運用量表驗證「人際支持較高，學生壓力較低」假設，其研究結果是成立的；但質性訪談卻發現部分高支持學生因文化期待反而壓力更高。下列那項說明可以解釋量化結果與質性發現之矛盾？",{"A":15,"B":16,"C":17,"D":18},"量表僅測量客觀或外顯的壓力與支持連結，而訪談則揭示支持關係背後隱藏的文化與主觀壓力脈絡","質性資料的樣本數過少，不足以推翻量化研究所建立的統計顯著性結論","顯示研究者之研究設計錯誤，使用錯誤研究假設與研究方法","表示研究工具可能出現測量不正確","A",null,[],"本題考點是量化與質性研究結果不一致時的解釋。依混合方法研究的觀點,量化量表擅長測量可標準化、外顯的變項關聯,質性訪談則能揭露主觀意義與文化脈絡,兩者不一致時常代表現象具有多層次面貌,A 正確說明了這種互補性。B 錯,質性研究目的不在以樣本數推翻統計結論,而在深化理解;C 錯,結果不一致不等於研究設計錯誤;D 錯,僅歸因於測量不正確,忽略了兩種方法捕捉的是不同層次的現象。",1,[25,28,32,35,39,43],{"webId":26,"stem":27,"number":10,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-115-2-research-methods-002","關於概念的特徵，下列何者錯誤？",{"webId":29,"stem":30,"number":31,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-115-2-research-methods-004","有關演繹邏輯的敘述，下列何者錯誤？",4,{"webId":33,"stem":34,"number":23,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-115-2-research-methods-001","下列那件事情對於深入掌握研究問題，相對而言效果有限？",{"webId":36,"stem":37,"number":38,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-115-2-research-methods-005","研究者欲探究原住民文化與所在地政治之關聯，以參與觀察、深度訪談與文獻分析進行資料蒐集，根據這些資料提出理論與建議。此一過程為下列何者？",5,{"webId":40,"stem":41,"number":42,"year":9,"session":23},"sw-115-1-research-methods-040","下列何者不是研究報告撰寫的倫理規範？",40,{"webId":44,"stem":45,"number":46,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-115-2-research-methods-006","假設服務使用頻率會透過與社會工作者的關係，而影響服務滿意度，下列敘述何者正確？",6,1791075276323]