[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":48},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-sw-114-2-social-work-025":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectFullName":4,"question":6,"related":24},"社會工作","social-work",{"id":7,"webId":8,"year":9,"session":10,"subject":4,"legacy":11,"number":12,"stem":13,"options":14,"answer":19,"answerNote":20,"images":21,"lawTimestamp":9,"explanation":22,"freq":23},"sw-114-2-社會工作-025","sw-114-2-social-work-025",114,2,false,25,"當一名獨居行動越來越不方便的老人近來跌倒二次，你判斷轉介到安養機構照顧會比較妥適，但是老人想繼續待在自家環境住所。依據 Lowenberg 和 Dolgoff（1992；2000）的社會工作倫理抉擇優先順序，你在轉介與否的選擇判斷上，應優先引用下列何種原則來考量？",{"A":15,"B":16,"C":17,"D":18},"最小傷害原則","多元文化原則","差別平等原則","自主自由原則","A",null,[],"本題考點是 Lowenberg 與 Dolgoff 倫理原則篩選（EPS）優先順序的應用。獨居老人跌倒兩次、社工判斷轉介安養較妥，但老人希望續留自宅，安全與意願衝突，且各選項皆涉及某種傷害。官方以「最小傷害原則」為優先依據——須在數個各有損害的選項間抉擇時，應選對服務對象傷害最小、最可回復者，故選A。B多元文化原則涉文化差異尊重，本題非文化衝突；C差別平等原則處理地位不對等者的差別對待，與本題個人安危抉擇不對應；D自主自由原則雖切合老人意願，但在此判準下讓位於身心傷害的權衡，故非優先依據。",1,[25,29,32,36,40,44],{"webId":26,"stem":27,"number":23,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-social-work-001","下列何者並非後現代女性主義的行動方向？",106,{"webId":30,"stem":31,"number":10,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-social-work-002","瑞摩（Reamer, 2013）認為在專業歷史發展中，社會工作的價值經歷過一些改變。總而言之，在過去一些年來，有六個主要取向是明顯的，以下那一項是錯誤的？",{"webId":33,"stem":34,"number":35,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-social-work-003","Munson（2002）在其《Handbook of Clinical Social Work Supervision》一書中將督導風格區分為「主動性（active）」和「反應性（reactive）」風格。以下那一項不是主動性督導風格的展現？",3,{"webId":37,"stem":38,"number":39,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-social-work-004","轉移作用（transference reactions）在下列那一種情況下較少發生？",4,{"webId":41,"stem":42,"number":43,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-social-work-005","在進行方案規劃時，常需要運用現有研究結果建議的資料，請問這種方式評量需求是屬於那一類的需求評量？",5,{"webId":45,"stem":46,"number":47,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-social-work-006","沛恩（Payne, 2005）在《Modern Social Work Theory》一書中提出反身－治療性觀點（reflexive-therapeutic views）為社會工作理論三類觀點之一，這類理論認為藉由促進成長及自我實現，以尋求個人、團體或社區的最大福祉。在服務的過程中，社會工作者及案主會相互影響。以下那一個社會工作理論或觀點非屬於反身-治療性的社會工作理論類別？",6,1784109480661]