[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":48},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-sw-114-2-social-work-008":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectFullName":4,"question":6,"related":24},"社會工作","social-work",{"id":7,"webId":8,"year":9,"session":10,"subject":4,"legacy":11,"number":12,"stem":13,"options":14,"answer":19,"answerNote":20,"images":21,"lawTimestamp":9,"explanation":22,"freq":23},"sw-114-2-社會工作-008","sw-114-2-social-work-008",114,2,false,8,"有關綜融社會工作實務（generalist social work practice）的敘述，下列何者正確？",{"A":15,"B":16,"C":17,"D":18},"在專業層次建立以實證研究為基礎的實務智慧（practice wisdom）","在宏觀層次的社區扮演使能者的角色（enabler）","在中距層次的個人與家庭扮演催化者（facilitator）","在宏觀層次的社區採取專業的涵化（acculturation）","A",null,[],"本題考點是綜融社會工作實務(generalist practice)的角色與層次配置。依綜融實務的三層次(微視\u002F中距\u002F宏觀)架構,A 正確:在專業層次應建立以實證研究為基礎的實務智慧(practice wisdom),使實務決策有證據支撐。B錯:使能者(enabler)主要是微視(個人)層次的角色,而非宏觀社區層次,層次與角色錯配。C錯:個人與家庭屬微視\u002F中距的服務對象,催化者(facilitator)多用於團體或組織情境,選項將層次與角色湊錯。D錯:「涵化(acculturation)」是文化適應概念,並非宏觀社區實務所採的專業角色,屬名詞誤植。故僅 A 對。",1,[25,29,32,36,40,44],{"webId":26,"stem":27,"number":23,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-social-work-001","下列何者並非後現代女性主義的行動方向？",106,{"webId":30,"stem":31,"number":10,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-social-work-002","瑞摩（Reamer, 2013）認為在專業歷史發展中，社會工作的價值經歷過一些改變。總而言之，在過去一些年來，有六個主要取向是明顯的，以下那一項是錯誤的？",{"webId":33,"stem":34,"number":35,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-social-work-003","Munson（2002）在其《Handbook of Clinical Social Work Supervision》一書中將督導風格區分為「主動性（active）」和「反應性（reactive）」風格。以下那一項不是主動性督導風格的展現？",3,{"webId":37,"stem":38,"number":39,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-social-work-004","轉移作用（transference reactions）在下列那一種情況下較少發生？",4,{"webId":41,"stem":42,"number":43,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-social-work-005","在進行方案規劃時，常需要運用現有研究結果建議的資料，請問這種方式評量需求是屬於那一類的需求評量？",5,{"webId":45,"stem":46,"number":47,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-social-work-006","沛恩（Payne, 2005）在《Modern Social Work Theory》一書中提出反身－治療性觀點（reflexive-therapeutic views）為社會工作理論三類觀點之一，這類理論認為藉由促進成長及自我實現，以尋求個人、團體或社區的最大福祉。在服務的過程中，社會工作者及案主會相互影響。以下那一個社會工作理論或觀點非屬於反身-治療性的社會工作理論類別？",6,1784109480500]