[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":48},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-sw-113-2-social-work-027":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectFullName":4,"question":6,"related":24},"社會工作","social-work",{"id":7,"webId":8,"year":9,"session":10,"subject":4,"legacy":11,"number":12,"stem":13,"options":14,"answer":19,"answerNote":20,"images":21,"lawTimestamp":9,"explanation":22,"freq":23},"sw-113-2-社會工作-027","sw-113-2-social-work-027",113,2,false,27,"服務對象是未成年之高二生，從小與爺爺相依為命。爺爺罹患重度失智症後，他為照顧爺爺經常不穩定就學，最後成為中途離校生。學校社會工作者家訪後發現，服務對象將爺爺照顧得很好，兩人目前是靠爺爺退休金和存款能維持生計。社工與服務對象會談後，其仍決定先照顧爺爺。社工應以何種準則作為倫理抉擇？",{"A":15,"B":16,"C":17,"D":18},"不應尊重服務對象的決定，因為個人幸福權優先於他人的自由權","應該尊重服務對象的決定，因為保護生命原則優先於自主自由原則","不應尊重服務對象的決定，因為生活品質優先於自主自由原則","應該尊重服務對象的決定，因為個人自由權優先於個人的基本幸福權","D",null,[],"本題考點是倫理原則衝突時的位階排序。依Reamer的倫理決策優先次序，「個人自由與自主權」高於「個人自身的基本幸福權」，意即一個具決定能力者，有權在僅涉及自身福祉、不損及他人的情況下，做出他人眼中未必最有利的選擇；高二生選擇繼續照顧爺爺屬其自我決定，故社工應尊重，選D。A把個人幸福權凌駕他人自由權，前提錯置。B以保護生命優先於自主，但本案並無立即生命危險，適用前提不符。C以生活品質優先於自主，違反Reamer將自主置於生活品質之上的排序，故不選。",1,[25,29,32,36,40,44],{"webId":26,"stem":27,"number":23,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-social-work-001","下列何者並非後現代女性主義的行動方向？",106,{"webId":30,"stem":31,"number":10,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-social-work-002","瑞摩（Reamer, 2013）認為在專業歷史發展中，社會工作的價值經歷過一些改變。總而言之，在過去一些年來，有六個主要取向是明顯的，以下那一項是錯誤的？",{"webId":33,"stem":34,"number":35,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-social-work-003","Munson（2002）在其《Handbook of Clinical Social Work Supervision》一書中將督導風格區分為「主動性（active）」和「反應性（reactive）」風格。以下那一項不是主動性督導風格的展現？",3,{"webId":37,"stem":38,"number":39,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-social-work-004","轉移作用（transference reactions）在下列那一種情況下較少發生？",4,{"webId":41,"stem":42,"number":43,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-social-work-005","在進行方案規劃時，常需要運用現有研究結果建議的資料，請問這種方式評量需求是屬於那一類的需求評量？",5,{"webId":45,"stem":46,"number":47,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-social-work-006","沛恩（Payne, 2005）在《Modern Social Work Theory》一書中提出反身－治療性觀點（reflexive-therapeutic views）為社會工作理論三類觀點之一，這類理論認為藉由促進成長及自我實現，以尋求個人、團體或社區的最大福祉。在服務的過程中，社會工作者及案主會相互影響。以下那一個社會工作理論或觀點非屬於反身-治療性的社會工作理論類別？",6,1784109480007]