[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":48},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-sw-113-1-research-methods-027":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectFullName":4,"question":6,"related":23},"社會工作研究方法","research-methods",{"id":7,"webId":8,"year":9,"session":10,"subject":4,"legacy":11,"number":12,"stem":13,"options":14,"answer":19,"answerNote":20,"images":21,"lawTimestamp":9,"explanation":22,"freq":10},"sw-113-1-社會工作研究方法-027","sw-113-1-research-methods-027",113,1,false,27,"下列何種研究設計，最不能檢驗變項的因果關係？",{"A":15,"B":16,"C":17,"D":18},"古典實驗研究設計（classical experimental design）","所羅門四組研究設計（Solomon four-group design）","只有後測有控制組的研究設計（posttest-only control group design）","只有一次測量的單組研究設計（one-shot case study）","D",null,[],"本題考點是各種研究設計對因果關係的檢證能力,而檢證因果須具備控制組與前後測以排除對立解釋。依實驗設計理論,D「單組一次測量設計(one-shot case study)」只對單一組別在介入後測一次,既無控制組、又無前測,無從比較、無從排除成熟、歷史等內在效度威脅,因此最不能檢驗變項的因果關係,答案選D。A古典實驗設計具隨機分派、控制組與前後測,因果推論力最強;B所羅門四組設計更能檢驗前測本身的影響,內在效度極高;C只有後測有控制組設計仍靠隨機分派與控制組建立比較基礎,亦優於D。",[24,28,32,36,40,44],{"webId":25,"stem":26,"number":10,"year":27,"session":10},"sw-106-1-research-methods-001","什麼是社會工作研究的第一步？",106,{"webId":29,"stem":30,"number":31,"year":27,"session":10},"sw-106-1-research-methods-002","執行研究是為了解概念，但我們仍得在研究前，針對概念給予基本描述與簡要定義。請問這個步驟是：",2,{"webId":33,"stem":34,"number":35,"year":27,"session":10},"sw-106-1-research-methods-003","皮爾森相關係數（r）有幾個特色，下列敘述何者錯誤？",3,{"webId":37,"stem":38,"number":39,"year":27,"session":10},"sw-106-1-research-methods-004","關於信效度的說明，下列何者正確？",4,{"webId":41,"stem":42,"number":43,"year":27,"session":10},"sw-106-1-research-methods-005","當我們要判斷兩個變項間是否有因果關係時，下列那種判斷標準不合適？",5,{"webId":45,"stem":46,"number":47,"year":27,"session":10},"sw-106-1-research-methods-006","關於演繹法的說明，何者有誤？",6,1784109498656]