[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":48},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-sw-112-1-research-methods-008":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectFullName":4,"question":6,"related":23},"社會工作研究方法","research-methods",{"id":7,"webId":8,"year":9,"session":10,"subject":4,"legacy":11,"number":12,"stem":13,"options":14,"answer":19,"answerNote":20,"images":21,"lawTimestamp":9,"explanation":22,"freq":10},"sw-112-1-社會工作研究方法-008","sw-112-1-research-methods-008",112,1,false,8,"關於虛假關係（spurious relationship），下列敘述何者正確？",{"A":15,"B":16,"C":17,"D":18},"兩個沒有因果關係的變項成為曲線關係","兩個有因果關係的變項，因為某干擾因素而導致統計學上的關係減弱","兩個沒有因果關係的變項，因為某些干擾因素而出現統計學上的相關","兩個有因果關係的變項，因為某干擾因素而出現統計學上的無關","C",null,[],"本題考點在理解「虛假關係（spurious relationship）」的定義。虛假關係指兩個變項本身「沒有真正的因果關係」，卻因為受到第三個干擾（外生）因素同時影響，而在統計上呈現出看似相關的假象，故選 C。A 把它說成「曲線關係」，混淆了關係的形狀（線性／非線性）與虛假性，錯誤。B 說「有因果關係的變項因干擾而關係減弱」，描述的是抑制或中介效果，非虛假關係，且前提設為有因果關係，錯誤。D 說「有因果關係的變項因干擾而呈現無關」，描述的是遮蔽（抑制）現象，同樣前提為有因果關係，與虛假關係「本無因果」相反，錯誤。",[24,28,32,36,40,44],{"webId":25,"stem":26,"number":10,"year":27,"session":10},"sw-106-1-research-methods-001","什麼是社會工作研究的第一步？",106,{"webId":29,"stem":30,"number":31,"year":27,"session":10},"sw-106-1-research-methods-002","執行研究是為了解概念，但我們仍得在研究前，針對概念給予基本描述與簡要定義。請問這個步驟是：",2,{"webId":33,"stem":34,"number":35,"year":27,"session":10},"sw-106-1-research-methods-003","皮爾森相關係數（r）有幾個特色，下列敘述何者錯誤？",3,{"webId":37,"stem":38,"number":39,"year":27,"session":10},"sw-106-1-research-methods-004","關於信效度的說明，下列何者正確？",4,{"webId":41,"stem":42,"number":43,"year":27,"session":10},"sw-106-1-research-methods-005","當我們要判斷兩個變項間是否有因果關係時，下列那種判斷標準不合適？",5,{"webId":45,"stem":46,"number":47,"year":27,"session":10},"sw-106-1-research-methods-006","關於演繹法的說明，何者有誤？",6,1784109497793]