[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":48},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-sw-111-2-social-work-022":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectFullName":4,"question":6,"related":24},"社會工作","social-work",{"id":7,"webId":8,"year":9,"session":10,"subject":4,"legacy":11,"number":12,"stem":13,"options":14,"answer":19,"answerNote":20,"images":21,"lawTimestamp":9,"explanation":22,"freq":23},"sw-111-2-社會工作-022","sw-111-2-social-work-022",111,2,false,22,"有關界線侵犯（boundary violation）與界線跨越（boundary crossing）之敘述，下列何者正確？",{"A":15,"B":16,"C":17,"D":18},"界線跨越是指社會工作者與案主之間有侵害和剝削案主利益的雙重關係","界線侵犯是社會工作者與案主之間出現非有益之雙重關係","界線跨越不一定有傷害性，有時有助於處遇","只要有雙重關係就一定不對","C",null,[],"本題考點是Reamer對界線跨越(boundary crossing)與界線侵犯(boundary violation)的區辨。界線侵犯指社工者與案主形成具剝削性、傷害案主利益的雙重關係；界線跨越則指偏離傳統專業界線但不必然造成傷害的行為，有時甚至有助於處遇(如家訪、適度自我揭露)，故正確者為C。A誤把「侵害剝削」的定義套在界線跨越上；B把界線侵犯定義為「非有益之雙重關係」過於寬鬆，侵犯關鍵在傷害與剝削而非僅是無益；D「只要有雙重關係就一定不對」過度絕對，忽略跨越與侵犯之別，均為錯誤。",1,[25,29,32,36,40,44],{"webId":26,"stem":27,"number":23,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-social-work-001","下列何者並非後現代女性主義的行動方向？",106,{"webId":30,"stem":31,"number":10,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-social-work-002","瑞摩（Reamer, 2013）認為在專業歷史發展中，社會工作的價值經歷過一些改變。總而言之，在過去一些年來，有六個主要取向是明顯的，以下那一項是錯誤的？",{"webId":33,"stem":34,"number":35,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-social-work-003","Munson（2002）在其《Handbook of Clinical Social Work Supervision》一書中將督導風格區分為「主動性（active）」和「反應性（reactive）」風格。以下那一項不是主動性督導風格的展現？",3,{"webId":37,"stem":38,"number":39,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-social-work-004","轉移作用（transference reactions）在下列那一種情況下較少發生？",4,{"webId":41,"stem":42,"number":43,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-social-work-005","在進行方案規劃時，常需要運用現有研究結果建議的資料，請問這種方式評量需求是屬於那一類的需求評量？",5,{"webId":45,"stem":46,"number":47,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-social-work-006","沛恩（Payne, 2005）在《Modern Social Work Theory》一書中提出反身－治療性觀點（reflexive-therapeutic views）為社會工作理論三類觀點之一，這類理論認為藉由促進成長及自我實現，以尋求個人、團體或社區的最大福祉。在服務的過程中，社會工作者及案主會相互影響。以下那一個社會工作理論或觀點非屬於反身-治療性的社會工作理論類別？",6,1784109478558]