[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":48},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-sw-109-2-research-methods-036":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectFullName":4,"question":6,"related":24},"社會工作研究方法","research-methods",{"id":7,"webId":8,"year":9,"session":10,"subject":4,"legacy":11,"number":12,"stem":13,"options":14,"answer":19,"answerNote":20,"images":21,"lawTimestamp":9,"explanation":22,"freq":23},"sw-109-2-社會工作研究方法-036","sw-109-2-research-methods-036",109,2,false,36,"進行質性研究資料分析時，先由某一特定主題開始分析，逐步將與研究主題有關的資料與概念，分門別類納入每一個主題下。請問上述資料分析是屬於何種分析策略？",{"A":15,"B":16,"C":17,"D":18},"主題分析法","彰顯法","連續逼近法","分析比較法","A",null,[],"本題考點在於辨識質性資料分析策略。題幹描述「先設定一個特定主題，再逐步將與該主題相關的資料與概念分門別類歸入各主題之下」，這種以主題為軸線、將資料歸類到主題架構中的作法即為主題分析法（thematic analysis），故選A。B彰顯法（illumination）並非標準的資料歸類策略；C連續逼近法（successive approximation）強調在資料與概念間反覆來回、逐步修正逼近，與題幹「先定主題再歸類」的描述不合；D分析比較法著重個案間或組別間的對照比較，亦非以單一主題向下分類。因此最符合者為主題分析法，選A。",1,[25,29,32,36,40,44],{"webId":26,"stem":27,"number":23,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-research-methods-001","什麼是社會工作研究的第一步？",106,{"webId":30,"stem":31,"number":10,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-research-methods-002","執行研究是為了解概念，但我們仍得在研究前，針對概念給予基本描述與簡要定義。請問這個步驟是：",{"webId":33,"stem":34,"number":35,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-research-methods-003","皮爾森相關係數（r）有幾個特色，下列敘述何者錯誤？",3,{"webId":37,"stem":38,"number":39,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-research-methods-004","關於信效度的說明，下列何者正確？",4,{"webId":41,"stem":42,"number":43,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-research-methods-005","當我們要判斷兩個變項間是否有因果關係時，下列那種判斷標準不合適？",5,{"webId":45,"stem":46,"number":47,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-research-methods-006","關於演繹法的說明，何者有誤？",6,1784109487519]