[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":48},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-sw-109-2-research-methods-007":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectFullName":4,"question":6,"related":24},"社會工作研究方法","research-methods",{"id":7,"webId":8,"year":9,"session":10,"subject":4,"legacy":11,"number":12,"stem":13,"options":14,"answer":19,"answerNote":20,"images":21,"lawTimestamp":9,"explanation":22,"freq":23},"sw-109-2-社會工作研究方法-007","sw-109-2-research-methods-007",109,2,false,7,"研究者試圖從研究中驗證因果關係，當無法執行實驗或準實驗設計可使用橫斷性研究（cross-sectional studies）時，如何增加由橫斷性資料進行因果推論的可能性，下列何者正確？",{"A":15,"B":16,"C":17,"D":18},"藉由多變項統計分析程序來控制干擾變項","降低測量偏誤","增加研究的反應性","處置擴散或仿效的威脅","A",null,[],"本題考點是橫斷性研究(cross-sectional study)如何提升因果推論的可能性。橫斷性研究在單一時間點蒐集資料,無法如實驗般操弄變項或建立時序,故其因果推論的最大威脅是干擾變項(confounding)未被控制。當無法做實驗或準實驗時,可藉由「多變項統計分析程序來控制干擾變項(A)」,以統計方式排除其他變項的影響,逼近因果推論,故選A。B「降低測量偏誤」提升的是測量品質而非因果推論、C「增加反應性」反而製造誤差、D「處置擴散或仿效威脅」是實驗情境中組間污染的內在效度議題,與橫斷性資料的因果推論策略不對應,故皆非。",1,[25,29,32,36,40,44],{"webId":26,"stem":27,"number":23,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-research-methods-001","什麼是社會工作研究的第一步？",106,{"webId":30,"stem":31,"number":10,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-research-methods-002","執行研究是為了解概念，但我們仍得在研究前，針對概念給予基本描述與簡要定義。請問這個步驟是：",{"webId":33,"stem":34,"number":35,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-research-methods-003","皮爾森相關係數（r）有幾個特色，下列敘述何者錯誤？",3,{"webId":37,"stem":38,"number":39,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-research-methods-004","關於信效度的說明，下列何者正確？",4,{"webId":41,"stem":42,"number":43,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-research-methods-005","當我們要判斷兩個變項間是否有因果關係時，下列那種判斷標準不合適？",5,{"webId":45,"stem":46,"number":47,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-research-methods-006","關於演繹法的說明，何者有誤？",6,1784109487265]