[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":48},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-sw-109-1-research-methods-033":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectFullName":4,"question":6,"related":23},"社會工作研究方法","research-methods",{"id":7,"webId":8,"year":9,"session":10,"subject":4,"legacy":11,"number":12,"stem":13,"options":14,"answer":19,"answerNote":20,"images":21,"lawTimestamp":9,"explanation":22,"freq":10},"sw-109-1-社會工作研究方法-033","sw-109-1-research-methods-033",109,1,false,33,"有位研究者想要驗證一種憂鬱治療團體的效果，於是找一群急症期的重度憂鬱患者參與團體，並以標準化的憂鬱篩檢工具來進行前後測。下列敘述何者錯誤？",{"A":15,"B":16,"C":17,"D":18},"研究結果前後測無顯著差異，研究者表示該憂鬱治療團體的效果不明顯","研究結果前後測無顯著差異，研究者宣稱可能因測量工具不靈敏，無法發現該憂鬱治療團體的效果","研究結果前後測有顯著差異，批評者認為可能僅是因統計迴歸造成的結果","研究結果前後測有顯著差異，研究者宣稱其證實該憂鬱治療團體確實有療效","D",null,[],"本題考點是單組前後測設計（one-group pretest-posttest design）的內在效度威脅與結果詮釋的謹慎程度。此設計缺乏控制組，前後差異未必來自介入。D「前後測有顯著差異即宣稱證實團體確有療效」屬過度推論，因無法排除歷史、成熟、統計迴歸等其他解釋，故D敘述錯誤、為本題答案。A承認無效果、B以測量工具不靈敏解釋無差異、C指出顯著差異可能來自統計迴歸，三者都對研究限制保持警覺、詮釋審慎，故屬正確。受試為急症期重度憂鬱者屬極端分數，回歸平均會產生統計迴歸假象，C的疑慮尤其成立。",[24,28,32,36,40,44],{"webId":25,"stem":26,"number":10,"year":27,"session":10},"sw-106-1-research-methods-001","什麼是社會工作研究的第一步？",106,{"webId":29,"stem":30,"number":31,"year":27,"session":10},"sw-106-1-research-methods-002","執行研究是為了解概念，但我們仍得在研究前，針對概念給予基本描述與簡要定義。請問這個步驟是：",2,{"webId":33,"stem":34,"number":35,"year":27,"session":10},"sw-106-1-research-methods-003","皮爾森相關係數（r）有幾個特色，下列敘述何者錯誤？",3,{"webId":37,"stem":38,"number":39,"year":27,"session":10},"sw-106-1-research-methods-004","關於信效度的說明，下列何者正確？",4,{"webId":41,"stem":42,"number":43,"year":27,"session":10},"sw-106-1-research-methods-005","當我們要判斷兩個變項間是否有因果關係時，下列那種判斷標準不合適？",5,{"webId":45,"stem":46,"number":47,"year":27,"session":10},"sw-106-1-research-methods-006","關於演繹法的說明，何者有誤？",6,1784109482286]