[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":48},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-sw-108-2-social-work-035":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectFullName":4,"question":6,"related":24},"社會工作","social-work",{"id":7,"webId":8,"year":9,"session":10,"subject":4,"legacy":11,"number":12,"stem":13,"options":14,"answer":19,"answerNote":20,"images":21,"lawTimestamp":9,"explanation":22,"freq":23},"sw-108-2-社會工作-035","sw-108-2-social-work-035",108,2,false,35,"關於身心障礙者去機構化與正常化之敘述，何者正確？①去機構化就等同於讓身心障礙者正常化生活 ②北美正常化觀點試圖強調結構面改革與障礙者平等公民權保障；北歐正常化觀點則著重於推動專業服務模式的改變 ③去機構化與正常化的論述是專業人員的反省 ④Wolfensberger 於 1980 年發展社會角色隱持觀點（Social Role Valorization），主張心智障礙者往往被多數群體貶抑，且越無法扮演社會角色就越被社會所貶抑",{"A":15,"B":16,"C":17,"D":18},"①②","③④","①③","②④","B",null,[],"本題考點是去機構化、正常化概念與 Wolfensberger 理論。③指出去機構化與正常化的論述源於專業人員對機構化的反省，正確；④Wolfensberger 提出社會角色珍視（Social Role Valorization），主張心智障礙者常被貶抑，越無法扮演有價值的社會角色就越受貶抑，正確。①誤，去機構化只是手段，不等同於正常化生活；②誤，其對北美與北歐正常化觀點的描述顛倒——北歐（Nirje）著重正常生活型態，北美 Wolfensberger 才發展社會角色珍視取向。正確為③④，選 B。",1,[25,29,32,36,40,44],{"webId":26,"stem":27,"number":23,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-social-work-001","下列何者並非後現代女性主義的行動方向？",106,{"webId":30,"stem":31,"number":10,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-social-work-002","瑞摩（Reamer, 2013）認為在專業歷史發展中，社會工作的價值經歷過一些改變。總而言之，在過去一些年來，有六個主要取向是明顯的，以下那一項是錯誤的？",{"webId":33,"stem":34,"number":35,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-social-work-003","Munson（2002）在其《Handbook of Clinical Social Work Supervision》一書中將督導風格區分為「主動性（active）」和「反應性（reactive）」風格。以下那一項不是主動性督導風格的展現？",3,{"webId":37,"stem":38,"number":39,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-social-work-004","轉移作用（transference reactions）在下列那一種情況下較少發生？",4,{"webId":41,"stem":42,"number":43,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-social-work-005","在進行方案規劃時，常需要運用現有研究結果建議的資料，請問這種方式評量需求是屬於那一類的需求評量？",5,{"webId":45,"stem":46,"number":47,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-social-work-006","沛恩（Payne, 2005）在《Modern Social Work Theory》一書中提出反身－治療性觀點（reflexive-therapeutic views）為社會工作理論三類觀點之一，這類理論認為藉由促進成長及自我實現，以尋求個人、團體或社區的最大福祉。在服務的過程中，社會工作者及案主會相互影響。以下那一個社會工作理論或觀點非屬於反身-治療性的社會工作理論類別？",6,1784109476453]