[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":48},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-sw-108-2-research-methods-007":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectFullName":4,"question":6,"related":24},"社會工作研究方法","research-methods",{"id":7,"webId":8,"year":9,"session":10,"subject":4,"legacy":11,"number":12,"stem":13,"options":14,"answer":19,"answerNote":20,"images":21,"lawTimestamp":9,"explanation":22,"freq":23},"sw-108-2-社會工作研究方法-007","sw-108-2-research-methods-007",108,2,false,7,"在說明變項間因果關係的檢測結果時，必須考量那二種效度？",{"A":15,"B":16,"C":17,"D":18},"內在效度與外在效度","內容效度與效標關聯效度","同時效度與預測效度","聚合效度與區別效度","A",null,[],"本題考點是檢測因果關係結果時須並重的兩種效度,正解為 A 內在效度與外在效度。內在效度指研究能否確認自變項確實造成依變項的變化、能否排除干擾與替代解釋,是因果宣稱本身能否成立的關鍵;外在效度指該因果結論能否推論至其他母體、情境與時間,涉及研究發現的類推性。二者共同界定因果檢測結果的可信度與可推廣程度。B 內容效度與效標關聯效度、C 同時效度與預測效度、D 聚合效度與區別效度,皆屬『測量效度』範疇,處理的是量表是否確實測到欲測構念,與『因果關係檢測』所指的研究設計效度層次不同,故非本題所問。",1,[25,29,32,36,40,44],{"webId":26,"stem":27,"number":23,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-research-methods-001","什麼是社會工作研究的第一步？",106,{"webId":30,"stem":31,"number":10,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-research-methods-002","執行研究是為了解概念，但我們仍得在研究前，針對概念給予基本描述與簡要定義。請問這個步驟是：",{"webId":33,"stem":34,"number":35,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-research-methods-003","皮爾森相關係數（r）有幾個特色，下列敘述何者錯誤？",3,{"webId":37,"stem":38,"number":39,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-research-methods-004","關於信效度的說明，下列何者正確？",4,{"webId":41,"stem":42,"number":43,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-research-methods-005","當我們要判斷兩個變項間是否有因果關係時，下列那種判斷標準不合適？",5,{"webId":45,"stem":46,"number":47,"year":28,"session":23},"sw-106-1-research-methods-006","關於演繹法的說明，何者有誤？",6,1784109494911]