[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":48},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-sw-108-1-social-work-026":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectFullName":4,"question":6,"related":23},"社會工作","social-work",{"id":7,"webId":8,"year":9,"session":10,"subject":4,"legacy":11,"number":12,"stem":13,"options":14,"answer":19,"answerNote":20,"images":21,"lawTimestamp":9,"explanation":22,"freq":10},"sw-108-1-社會工作-026","sw-108-1-social-work-026",108,1,false,26,"根據 Reamer（1995）對於業務過失（malpractice）的定義，社會工作師原先計畫和案主一起出席社區改建的公聽會，卻未事先告知當日無法出席而讓案主獨自出席，這是屬於何種業務過失？",{"A":15,"B":16,"C":17,"D":18},"瀆職","濫權","侵權","怠職","D",null,[],"本題考點是 Reamer(1995)對社會工作業務過失(malpractice)的類型區分。社工原先承諾與案主一同出席公聽會,卻未事先告知即缺席,屬於『應作為而未作為』的疏失——即怠職(未履行應盡職責、疏於作為),故 D 正確。A 瀆職(malfeasance)指從事本不應為的錯誤或不當行為,屬積極的作為過失,與本題『未出席、未告知』的消極不作為不符。B 濫權指逾越或不當使用職權,本題無權力濫用情形。C 侵權在此指侵害案主權利的行為,但本情境核心是未履行約定之照顧義務的疏於作為,最貼切者為怠職。關鍵在辨識『不作為的疏失』對應怠職。",[24,28,32,36,40,44],{"webId":25,"stem":26,"number":10,"year":27,"session":10},"sw-106-1-social-work-001","下列何者並非後現代女性主義的行動方向？",106,{"webId":29,"stem":30,"number":31,"year":27,"session":10},"sw-106-1-social-work-002","瑞摩（Reamer, 2013）認為在專業歷史發展中，社會工作的價值經歷過一些改變。總而言之，在過去一些年來，有六個主要取向是明顯的，以下那一項是錯誤的？",2,{"webId":33,"stem":34,"number":35,"year":27,"session":10},"sw-106-1-social-work-003","Munson（2002）在其《Handbook of Clinical Social Work Supervision》一書中將督導風格區分為「主動性（active）」和「反應性（reactive）」風格。以下那一項不是主動性督導風格的展現？",3,{"webId":37,"stem":38,"number":39,"year":27,"session":10},"sw-106-1-social-work-004","轉移作用（transference reactions）在下列那一種情況下較少發生？",4,{"webId":41,"stem":42,"number":43,"year":27,"session":10},"sw-106-1-social-work-005","在進行方案規劃時，常需要運用現有研究結果建議的資料，請問這種方式評量需求是屬於那一類的需求評量？",5,{"webId":45,"stem":46,"number":47,"year":27,"session":10},"sw-106-1-social-work-006","沛恩（Payne, 2005）在《Modern Social Work Theory》一書中提出反身－治療性觀點（reflexive-therapeutic views）為社會工作理論三類觀點之一，這類理論認為藉由促進成長及自我實現，以尋求個人、團體或社區的最大福祉。在服務的過程中，社會工作者及案主會相互影響。以下那一個社會工作理論或觀點非屬於反身-治療性的社會工作理論類別？",6,1784109473242]