[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":48},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-sw-107-1-policy-legislation-009":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectFullName":4,"question":6,"related":23},"社會政策與社會立法","policy-legislation",{"id":7,"webId":8,"year":9,"session":10,"subject":4,"legacy":11,"number":12,"stem":13,"options":14,"answer":19,"answerNote":20,"images":21,"lawTimestamp":9,"explanation":22,"freq":10},"sw-107-1-社會政策與社會立法-009","sw-107-1-policy-legislation-009",107,1,false,9,"當今臺灣社會生育率低，其原因多元。若政府想要鼓勵民眾生育，提升生育率，在下列四個選項中，那一個選項是社會政策相較容易介入，並產生影響民眾願意生育的效果？",{"A":15,"B":16,"C":17,"D":18},"市場托育費用太高、品質參差不齊，影響民眾生育意願","現代社會青年人的生活型態與婚姻觀轉變，延遲結婚的進程","婦女教育程度提升，考量教育投資及個人發展而全力投入勞動市場","民眾理性計算結婚與養育子女的成本影響到個人自主與生活品質，選擇不婚或不生","A",null,[],"本題考點在於辨識社會政策的「可介入性」——區分政策工具能直接改變的制度性因素,與難以直接改變的個人價值觀。依政策分析原理,「托育費用太高、品質參差不齊」屬於托育市場失靈,政府可透過托育公共化、費用補助與品質管理等供給面、價格面工具直接介入,對生育意願產生較明確的政策效果,故選 A。B 錯,青年生活型態與婚姻觀的轉變屬文化價值層面,政策難以直接改變;C 錯,婦女教育投資與生涯發展是個人長期抉擇與社會變遷結果,非政策短期可扭轉;D 錯,個人對婚育成本與自主生活的理性計算同屬價值偏好,政策介入空間有限。",[24,28,32,36,40,44],{"webId":25,"stem":26,"number":10,"year":27,"session":10},"sw-106-1-policy-legislation-001","志願服務法第 22 條規定：志工依志願服務運用單位之指示進行志願服務時，因故意或過失不法侵害他人權利者，由誰負擔損害賠償責任？",106,{"webId":29,"stem":30,"number":31,"year":27,"session":10},"sw-106-1-policy-legislation-002","精神衛生法第 41 條規定：嚴重病人傷害他人或自己或有傷害之虞，緊急安置及強制鑑定後，仍有全日住院治療必要，經詢問嚴重病人意見，仍拒絕接受或無法表達時，應向何機關或單位申請許可強制住院？",2,{"webId":33,"stem":34,"number":35,"year":27,"session":10},"sw-106-1-policy-legislation-003","性侵害犯罪防治法第 8 條規定：醫事人員、社工人員、教育人員等，於執行職務時知有疑似性侵害犯罪情事者，應立即向當地直轄市、縣（市）主管機關通報，至遲不得超過幾小時？",3,{"webId":37,"stem":38,"number":39,"year":27,"session":10},"sw-106-1-policy-legislation-004","少年事件處理法第 18 條第 2 項規定：對於少年有監督權人、少年之肄業學校或從事少年保護事業之機構，發現少年有第 3 條第 2 款之虞犯事件者，得請求何機關處理之？",4,{"webId":41,"stem":42,"number":43,"year":27,"session":10},"sw-106-1-policy-legislation-005","家庭暴力防治法第 63 條之 1 規定：被害人年滿幾歲，遭受現有或曾有親密關係之未同居伴侶施以身體或精神上不法侵害之情事者，可準用相關規定申請保護令？",5,{"webId":45,"stem":46,"number":47,"year":27,"session":10},"sw-106-1-policy-legislation-006","依據家庭暴力防治法第 15 條第 1 項：通常保護令之有效期間為幾年以下，自核發時起生效？",6,1784109484332]