[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":47},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-sw-106-2-research-methods-024":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectFullName":4,"question":6,"related":24},"社會工作研究方法","research-methods",{"id":7,"webId":8,"year":9,"session":10,"subject":4,"legacy":11,"number":12,"stem":13,"options":14,"answer":19,"answerNote":20,"images":21,"lawTimestamp":9,"explanation":22,"freq":23},"sw-106-2-社會工作研究方法-024","sw-106-2-research-methods-024",106,2,false,24,"對於古典實驗法的敘述，下列何者正確？",{"A":15,"B":16,"C":17,"D":18},"一項實驗是要檢視一個依變項對於一個自變項所產生的影響","受試者被隨機分為控制組及實驗組之後，會測量依變項是否相同之後繼續進行","雙盲實驗（double-blind experiment）指的是受試者與實驗者都會互相知道且了解知道誰是實驗組、誰是控制組的實驗設計","霍桑效應（Hawthorne effect）係指針對伊利諾州芝加哥市郊霍桑區的西方電器廠所進行工作條件的研究，研究發現工人生產力的提升主要是由工作條件改善所造成","B",null,[],"本題考點是古典實驗設計的程序與相關概念。依古典實驗設計,受試者先隨機分派為實驗組與控制組,接著兩組進行前測以確認依變項起點是否相當,再施予實驗刺激後比較後測,故 B 正確。A 錯在因果方向顛倒:實驗檢視的是「自變項對依變項」的影響;C 錯在雙盲實驗是受試者與實驗人員「都不知道」誰屬實驗組、誰屬控制組,以防期望偏誤,並非互相知道;D 錯在霍桑效應的發現是工人因「被關注、被觀察」而提升生產力,而非工作條件改善所致。",1,[25,28,31,35,39,43],{"webId":26,"stem":27,"number":23,"year":9,"session":23},"sw-106-1-research-methods-001","什麼是社會工作研究的第一步？",{"webId":29,"stem":30,"number":10,"year":9,"session":23},"sw-106-1-research-methods-002","執行研究是為了解概念，但我們仍得在研究前，針對概念給予基本描述與簡要定義。請問這個步驟是：",{"webId":32,"stem":33,"number":34,"year":9,"session":23},"sw-106-1-research-methods-003","皮爾森相關係數（r）有幾個特色，下列敘述何者錯誤？",3,{"webId":36,"stem":37,"number":38,"year":9,"session":23},"sw-106-1-research-methods-004","關於信效度的說明，下列何者正確？",4,{"webId":40,"stem":41,"number":42,"year":9,"session":23},"sw-106-1-research-methods-005","當我們要判斷兩個變項間是否有因果關係時，下列那種判斷標準不合適？",5,{"webId":44,"stem":45,"number":46,"year":9,"session":23},"sw-106-1-research-methods-006","關於演繹法的說明，何者有誤？",6,1784109472228]