[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":47},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-sw-106-2-research-methods-017":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectFullName":4,"question":6,"related":24},"社會工作研究方法","research-methods",{"id":7,"webId":8,"year":9,"session":10,"subject":4,"legacy":11,"number":12,"stem":13,"options":14,"answer":19,"answerNote":20,"images":21,"lawTimestamp":9,"explanation":22,"freq":23},"sw-106-2-社會工作研究方法-017","sw-106-2-research-methods-017",106,2,false,17,"在進行推論統計時，研究人員無可避免地必須承擔錯誤的風險，名為第一型錯誤（type I error）與第二型錯誤（type II error）。今當顯著水準由 0.05 變更為 0.01 時，犯上述錯誤的風險會如何改變？",{"A":15,"B":16,"C":17,"D":18},"犯第一型錯誤的風險降低，犯第二型錯誤的風險提高","犯第一型錯誤的風險提高，犯第二型錯誤的風險降低","犯第一型錯誤的風險降低，犯第二型錯誤的風險不變","犯第一型錯誤的風險不變，犯第二型錯誤的風險降低","A",null,[],"本題考點是顯著水準與兩類錯誤的消長關係。依假設檢定理論,第一型錯誤(α)是虛無假設為真卻誤予拒絕的機率,顯著水準即研究者容許的 α 上限;將顯著水準由 0.05 改為 0.01,等於把拒絕虛無假設的門檻變嚴,犯第一型錯誤的風險降低;但門檻變嚴也使「該拒絕時不敢拒絕」的情形增加,犯第二型錯誤(β,虛無假設為假卻未拒絕)的風險隨之提高,故選 A。B 方向完全相反;C 與 D 誤以為其中一類錯誤的風險不變,忽略了在樣本數等其他條件不變下,α 與 β 此消彼長的取捨關係。",1,[25,28,31,35,39,43],{"webId":26,"stem":27,"number":23,"year":9,"session":23},"sw-106-1-research-methods-001","什麼是社會工作研究的第一步？",{"webId":29,"stem":30,"number":10,"year":9,"session":23},"sw-106-1-research-methods-002","執行研究是為了解概念，但我們仍得在研究前，針對概念給予基本描述與簡要定義。請問這個步驟是：",{"webId":32,"stem":33,"number":34,"year":9,"session":23},"sw-106-1-research-methods-003","皮爾森相關係數（r）有幾個特色，下列敘述何者錯誤？",3,{"webId":36,"stem":37,"number":38,"year":9,"session":23},"sw-106-1-research-methods-004","關於信效度的說明，下列何者正確？",4,{"webId":40,"stem":41,"number":42,"year":9,"session":23},"sw-106-1-research-methods-005","當我們要判斷兩個變項間是否有因果關係時，下列那種判斷標準不合適？",5,{"webId":44,"stem":45,"number":46,"year":9,"session":23},"sw-106-1-research-methods-006","關於演繹法的說明，何者有誤？",6,1784109472159]