[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":47},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-sw-106-1-research-methods-008":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectFullName":4,"question":6,"related":23},"社會工作研究方法","research-methods",{"id":7,"webId":8,"year":9,"session":10,"subject":4,"legacy":11,"number":12,"stem":13,"options":14,"answer":19,"answerNote":20,"images":21,"lawTimestamp":9,"explanation":22,"freq":10},"sw-106-1-社會工作研究方法-008","sw-106-1-research-methods-008",106,1,false,8,"當控制變項 Z，原先被視為有因果關係的 X 與 Y 兩個變項間的關係消失了，這個被控制的變項 Z 是：",{"A":15,"B":16,"C":17,"D":18},"前導變項（antecedent variable）","內含變項（component variable）","外加變項（extraneous variable）","中介變項（intervening variable）","D",null,[],"本題考點在於闡釋模式中控制變項的類型辨識。依 Lazarsfeld 闡釋模式,中介變項位於 X 與 Y 的因果鏈中間(X→Z→Y),是 X 影響 Y 的傳遞機制,控制後兩者關係即消失,此為「詮釋(interpretation)」型態,故選 D。A 錯,前導變項位於 X 之前,控制它時 X 與 Y 的關係不會消失;B 錯,內含變項是概念本身的組成部分,非因果鏈上的第三變項;C 錯在情境不符:外加變項雖也使關係消失,但屬 X、Y 原本即無因果的虛假關係,與題幹「原先被視為有因果關係」不合。",[24,27,31,35,39,43],{"webId":25,"stem":26,"number":10,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-106-1-research-methods-001","什麼是社會工作研究的第一步？",{"webId":28,"stem":29,"number":30,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-106-1-research-methods-002","執行研究是為了解概念，但我們仍得在研究前，針對概念給予基本描述與簡要定義。請問這個步驟是：",2,{"webId":32,"stem":33,"number":34,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-106-1-research-methods-003","皮爾森相關係數（r）有幾個特色，下列敘述何者錯誤？",3,{"webId":36,"stem":37,"number":38,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-106-1-research-methods-004","關於信效度的說明，下列何者正確？",4,{"webId":40,"stem":41,"number":42,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-106-1-research-methods-005","當我們要判斷兩個變項間是否有因果關係時，下列那種判斷標準不合適？",5,{"webId":44,"stem":45,"number":46,"year":9,"session":10},"sw-106-1-research-methods-006","關於演繹法的說明，何者有誤？",6,1784109469920]